1.0 DOCUMENT INFORMATION
1.1 Document Title: TDE Soil Water Data By TDR for treatement and slope
positions
1.2 Revision Date: 23 August 2005
1.3 Document Summary: Periodic measurements of soil water
content by TDR 1993-2005.
1.4 Sponsor: Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U. S.
DOE
2.0 INVESTIGATOR
2.1 Investigator and data set contact:
P.J. Hanson (hansonpj@ornl.gov)2.2 Title Of Investigation:
Environmental Sciences Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Building 1059, P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6422
3.0 DATA SUMMARY
Mean daily soil water content data for the TDE treatment plots
including
data for the 0-35 cm depth and estimates of soil water potential for
the
0-35 depth increment.
The data are provided for the following nine positions across the TDE site:

4.0 PROCEDURES
Soil water content (%, v/v) was measured with a time domain
reflectometer
(TDR; Soil Moisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, California)
following
the procedure of Topp and Davis (1985) as documented for soils with
high
coarse fraction content (Drungil et al. 1987). Three hundred ten
sampling locations were installed at an 8 x 8 meter spacing across the
site giving more than 100 soil water monitoring locations per
plot.
At each location two pairs of TDR waveguides were installed in a
vertical
orientation (0-0.35 and 0-0.7 m). The surface (0-0.35 m) TDR
measurements
coincide with the zone of maxium root density in these soils. TDR
measurements were obtained biweekly during the growing season and
approximately
monthly during the dormant season. The TDR soil water content
measurements
were adjusted for the coarse fraction of these soils (mean coarse
fraction
of 14%) and converted to soil water potentials using laboratory derived
soil moisture retention curves for the A, A/E and E/B horizons (Hanson
et al. 1998).
5.0 OBSERVATION NOTES
None
6.0 DATA ORGANIZATION
Data are provided in comma delimeted text files where the first line
includes the variable names and subsequent lines include the following
data by month.
6.1 Variable, Definition, and Units
Column 2 = DOY
Day of the year (1-366)
Column 3 = RDOY
Days since January 1, 1993 (1-2922)
Column 4 = WB
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
bottom wet plot location.
Column 5 = WM
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
middle wet plot location.
Column 6 = WU
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
upper wet plot location.
Column 7 = AB
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
bottom ambient plot location.
Column 8 = AM
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
middle ambient plot location.
Column 9 = AU
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
upper ambient plot location.
Column 10 = DB
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
bottom dry plot location.
Column 11 = DM
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
middle dry plot location.
Column 12 = DU
Mean water content of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in % v/v of the
upper dry plot location.
Column 13 = WBwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the bottom wet plot location.
Column 14 = WMwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the middle wet plot location.
Column 15 = WUwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the upper wet plot location.
Column 16 = ABwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the bottom ambient plot location.
Column 17 = AMwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the middle ambient plot location.
Column 18 = AUwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the upper ambient plot location.
Column 19 = DBwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the bottom dry plot location.
Column 20 = DMwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the middle dry plot location.
Column 21 = DUwp
Mean water potential of the 0 to 35 cm depth incrrement in MPa for
the upper dry plot location.
7.0 KNOWN ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
These daily data and the original hourly data from which they were
derived have been checked for errors and missing data.
8.0 NOTES
8.1 Limitations of the data: Not all TDE
locations
(i.e., nine plot posiitons) have data on all dates.
8.2 Known Problems With The Data: None.
8.3 Usage Guidance: None.
9.0 REFERENCES:
Hanson, P.J., D.E. Todd, N.T. Edwards, and M.A. Huston. 1995. Field performance of the Walker Branch Throughfall Displacement Experiment, In: A. Jenkins, R.C. Ferrier, and C. Kirby, eds., Ecosystem Manipulation Experiments: scientific approaches, experimental design and relevant results, Ecosystem Research Report #20, Commission of the European Communities, pp. 307-313.
Hanson, P.J., D.E. Todd, M.A. Huston, J.D. Joslin, Jennifer Croker, and R. M. Augé. 1998. Description and field performance of the Walker Branch Throughfall Displacement Experiment: 1993-1996, ORNL/TM-13586, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Hanson P.J. 2000. Large-scale Water Manipulations -- chapter 23 In: O.E. Sala, R.B. Jackson, H.A. Mooney, and R.W. Howarth, eds. Methods in Ecosystem Science, Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 341-352.
<>Hanson, P.J. , D.E.Todd and J.S. Amthor. 2001. A six year study of sapling and large-tree growth and mortality responses to natural and induced variability in precipitation and throughfall. Tree Physiology 21:345-358TDR soil water content and potential data for
'nine
plot' locations throughout 1993-2005